A week ago I finally finished The Phone Book: The Curious History of the Book That Everyone Uses But No One Reads, by Ammon Shea. This is one of those books that I read the title and description and was intrigued, and found a copy on the cheap. I picked it up and actually got pretty far into it, but then got sidetracked by other books. It was looking pretty silly to have it on my "currently reading" list on goodreads.com for so long, so I decided enough was enough and finished it.
I know it sounds like a super geeky book, but it was actually really good. Mostly because Shea has a very readable style, so that something that could become tedious is pretty interesting. And you would be surprised at how much there is to know about the history of the phone book. But Shea doesn't just retell the history. He tells about how people have used it and for what, people who collect them, people who tear them in half, and what the future is looking like for the poor phone book. The book is chock full of information (and by the book, I was thinking of Shea's, but the phone book is, too, really). Shea does a great job covering a topic no one would usually think to explore because most people don't care, and while you read, you find you do care. I don't think I will ever look at a phone book the same way again.
Anyway, if you are looking for a good non-fiction read about a random topic, this one fits the bill. Seriously, it was a good book, and I'm glad I read it. And, in honor of this fine piece of work, check out this link: http://ur.umich.edu/9899/Jun21_99/3.htm
Lo, the power of the phone book.
Showing posts with label non-fiction. Show all posts
Showing posts with label non-fiction. Show all posts
Sunday, June 30, 2013
Saturday, June 15, 2013
Birds birds everywhere
As promised, more on Birdology, by Sy Mongomery. First off, I feel that this book deserves it's full title, which is (are you ready?): BIRDOLOGY: ADVENTURES WITH A PACK OF HENS, A PECK OF PIGEONS, CANTANKEROUS CROWS, FIERCE FALCONS, HIP HOP PARROTS, BABY HUMMINGBIRDS, AND ONE MURDEROUSLY BIG LIVING DINOSAUR. (Yes, I had to copy and paste that. How else was I ever going to get it all in their correctly?) I had no idea what this book was even about, but my brother put it on his Goodreads list, and I'll be honest, I found the title so intriguing, I figured how could it not be good and decided I had to read it. (Which goes to show the power of a good title).
My brother is a birder, and while I'm not one, I have nothing against birds. I probably would never pick up a book about birds if it didn't have such a beckoning title, although having read this book, that might change. It was a really interesting book. I learned a lot about birds in general, and several types of birds specifically. And I now know that I will never be a hummingbird rehabber. Also, despite how much Sy loves chickens, I am not going to become a chicken lover. Except for dinner. And lunch. (I have no problem eating chicken. In fact, I feel pretty good about it.) I have a huge respect and admiration for cassowaries now.
Bottom line, this is a really good book. It's informative but narrative. So not a bunch of facts poured out at length, but a very personal account with facts thrown in to give insight into the narrator's feelings. The book did not convert me into an avian adorer, but I have a new/different appreciation for them and the mild random interest I had in them out of experience with my brother has grown to a more educated interest for their own sake. And mine. The title did not betray the book--it is definitely worth reading.
My brother is a birder, and while I'm not one, I have nothing against birds. I probably would never pick up a book about birds if it didn't have such a beckoning title, although having read this book, that might change. It was a really interesting book. I learned a lot about birds in general, and several types of birds specifically. And I now know that I will never be a hummingbird rehabber. Also, despite how much Sy loves chickens, I am not going to become a chicken lover. Except for dinner. And lunch. (I have no problem eating chicken. In fact, I feel pretty good about it.) I have a huge respect and admiration for cassowaries now.
Bottom line, this is a really good book. It's informative but narrative. So not a bunch of facts poured out at length, but a very personal account with facts thrown in to give insight into the narrator's feelings. The book did not convert me into an avian adorer, but I have a new/different appreciation for them and the mild random interest I had in them out of experience with my brother has grown to a more educated interest for their own sake. And mine. The title did not betray the book--it is definitely worth reading.
Saturday, April 6, 2013
"Have you read" and other odds and ends
This week, my Google reader had a BBC story on the 100 books teachers recommend, which linked to this article that gives the actual 100 books: 100 Favourite Books (yeah, it's British). I will copy the list at the bottom, with my commentary, and you can read it if you want.
I know last week, I mentioned that article, about guns and Swiss gun culture. It's an article I really do want to discuss, but I don't want this to get so long that I lose your attention. But, if you'll notice, it is also a BBC article. So, yes, I'm going to confess: I prefer to get my news from the UK. I follow the BBC in Google Reader, and if I ever subscribe to a magazine, it's going to be The Economist. Why do I like British news so much? 1) They have a much better global perspective. They give worldwide coverage with a global perspective, if you know what I mean. 2) their coverage of American events is unbiased by political partyism, so even their American news is, in many ways, better, because you don't have to cut through the rhetoric. Just my opinions, though.
What all that has to do with reading, I don't know. Maybe, "expand your horizons" and "It's important to read a variety of materials, not just literature." But, I did read some literature, too. I've been enjoying P.G. Wodehouse of late. Today, I finished listening to Jeeves and the Mating Season, and I'm just going to say, delightful. My siblings and I used to play a game called "Doctor, Doctor," where one person would be the doctor and leave the room. The rest of us joined hands in a circle and tangled ourselves up as much as possible (step over linked hands, crawl underneath). Then we called "Doctor, doctor, we need help!" and the doctor had to come untangle us without anyone ever letting go of anyone else's hand. The goal was to have us in the original circle, holding hands. That basically describes the plot of this book. Read it and enjoy.
So, now, if you aren't interested in my opinionated commentary, you may depart and get on with your life. But, you are welcome to see the list of 100 and what I have to say, if you like.
I know last week, I mentioned that article, about guns and Swiss gun culture. It's an article I really do want to discuss, but I don't want this to get so long that I lose your attention. But, if you'll notice, it is also a BBC article. So, yes, I'm going to confess: I prefer to get my news from the UK. I follow the BBC in Google Reader, and if I ever subscribe to a magazine, it's going to be The Economist. Why do I like British news so much? 1) They have a much better global perspective. They give worldwide coverage with a global perspective, if you know what I mean. 2) their coverage of American events is unbiased by political partyism, so even their American news is, in many ways, better, because you don't have to cut through the rhetoric. Just my opinions, though.
What all that has to do with reading, I don't know. Maybe, "expand your horizons" and "It's important to read a variety of materials, not just literature." But, I did read some literature, too. I've been enjoying P.G. Wodehouse of late. Today, I finished listening to Jeeves and the Mating Season, and I'm just going to say, delightful. My siblings and I used to play a game called "Doctor, Doctor," where one person would be the doctor and leave the room. The rest of us joined hands in a circle and tangled ourselves up as much as possible (step over linked hands, crawl underneath). Then we called "Doctor, doctor, we need help!" and the doctor had to come untangle us without anyone ever letting go of anyone else's hand. The goal was to have us in the original circle, holding hands. That basically describes the plot of this book. Read it and enjoy.
So, now, if you aren't interested in my opinionated commentary, you may depart and get on with your life. But, you are welcome to see the list of 100 and what I have to say, if you like.
TEACHERS’ TOP 100 BOOKS
1. Pride and Prejudice Jane Austen
The first time I tried to read it, I got bored and quit. Picked it up later, and was so glad I did. It is excellent, and I particularly enjoy that it's not (at least to me) promoting one gender over another. In the end, they both make mistakes, and both are good enough to admit it.
2. To Kill a Mockingbird Harper Lee
Love love LOVE this book! Atticus Finch is my hero.
3. Harry Potter (series) J.K. Rowling
I take great pride in the fact that I started these before the big fanatic frenzy broke loose. I do enjoy these books. They are really fun reading. I don't rate the characters on the level of Atticus Finch--in some ways, they are flawed, but I still love the books.
4. Wuthering Heights Emily Bronte
Haven't read it
5. Jane Eyre Charlotte Bronte
I read it in high school, and haven't picked it up since. But I should probably read it again.
6. Nineteen Eighty-Four George Orwell
Haven't read it, but it's on my list
7. The Lord of the Rings (series) J.R.R. Tolkien
LOVE this trilogy. In my opinion, in terms of character, it is way better than Harry Potter. It is an incredible piece of literature.
8. The Book Thief Markus Zusak
I really like this book--I find the narrator to be an interesting and fascinating choice.
9. The Hobbit J.R.R. Tolkien
Love it--excellent use of language, terrific plot, super fun.
10. The Great Gatsby F. Scott Fitzgerald
I've read it twice, and I want to read it again. I still remember the fake books.
11. The Kite Runner Khaled Hosseini
Haven't read it
12. The Hunger Games (series) Suzanne Collins
Took me a while to break down and read it--it seemed so gory. But, I really enjoyed the series, even the third book.
13. The Time Traveller’s Wife Audrey Niffenegger
Haven't read it, but I'm intrigued
14. The Chronicles of Narnia (series) C.S. Lewis
Excellent series, definitely one that deserves to be on the list
15. Of Mice and Men John Steinbeck
Haven't read it, but I feel like I should read some Steinbeck (I've never read anything by him).
16. Birdsong Sebastian Faulks
Haven't read it--is it incriminating to say I've never even heard of it?
17. His Dark Materials (series) Philip Pullman
Haven't read it. I did read his series about Sally whoever, his mystery series. I really enjoyed those books, and maybe at some point I'll read this series.
18. The Gruffalo Julia Donaldson and Axel Scheffler
Lots of fun. Just so you know, it's a picture book series, but I really enjoy these books. Also, if you are a Whovian, in season 5, "The Hungry Earth."
19. The Catcher in the Rye J.D. Salinger
Haven't read it
20. Life of Pi Yann Martel
Haven't read it, but I want to.
21. Tess of the d’Urbervilles Thomas Hardy
Read it, and it was super depressing. I don't even remember the plot details, I just know that it was one of those endings where everyone ends up miserable.
22. Rebecca Daphne du Maurier
I really liked this one. I seem to recall that I felt like I shouldn't like it, or like the lead male, but I did.
23. The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time Mark Haddon
Haven't read it
24. Lord of the Flies William Golding
Read it, in high school, it is kind of gory. Has parallels to The Hunger Games.
25. Matilda Roald Dahl
Read it, it's a good one.
26. Catch-22 Joseph Heller
Haven't read it. I started it, but got halfway through and was tired of all the trash in it.
27. Millennium (series) Stieg Larsson
Haven't read it
28. Animal Farm George Orwell
Read it, I recall enjoying it, but it's been a while. It's one to read.
29. The Handmaid’s Tale Margaret Atwood
Read it, and I wrote about it I think. It's one that I liked, but I don't know that I'll read it again, and I'd be cautious who I recommend it to.
30. Persuasion Jane Austen
Another really good one.
31. One Hundred Years of Solitude Gabriel Garcia Marquez
Haven't read it. I started it, because every Spanish major should read it right? But, again--there was so much garbage in it (or else I really didn't understand my Spanish, but the dictionary was really expanding my do-not-use vocab) I tossed it.
32. Kensuke’s Kingdom Michael Morpurgo
Haven't read it
33. Goodnight Mister Tom Michelle Magorian
I really liked this book. It takes place during WWII, but is less about WWII and more about abuse and love.
34. The Grapes of Wrath John Steinbeck
Haven't read it
35. Charlie and the Chocolate Factory Roald Dahl
I've read it. Not my favorite, but it is a classic and a good read.
36. The Boy in the Striped Pyjamas John Boyne
Haven't read it. I watched the movie, and I don't know--if the book is like the movie, it is too tragic to read.
37. Little Women Louisa May Alcott
Classic. I do feel like it is very much fiction for females. Not because it's soap opera-ish. It is just one of those art-imitating-life stories.
38. One Day David Nicholls
Haven't read it (never heard of it!)
39. We Need to Talk About Kevin Lionel Shriver
Haven't read it, or even heard of it
40. The Twits Roald Dahl
Read it, not sure I'd put it on a must read list, but it's been a while, and so who knows.
41. Wolf Hall Hilary Mantel
Haven't read it or heard of it
42. A Thousand Splendid Suns Khaled Hosseini
Read it, and it was interesting, but in terms of gaining an understanding of what it's like to be a woman in the middle east, I'd recommend The Bookseller of Kabul.
43. The Wind in the Willows Kenneth Grahame
Haven't read it
44. Frankenstein Mary Shelley
Haven't read it
45. Great Expectations Charles Dickens
Haven't read it
46. Captain Corelli’s Mandolin Louis de Bernieres
Haven't read it
47. George’s Marvellous Medicine Roald Dahl
I read it, but I really don't remember it. It was one that I read decades ago (not many decades ago, but still).
48. The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy Douglas Adams
Really enjoyed this book. Whimsy, that's all I can say.
49. Room Emma Donoghue
Haven't read it, or heard of it
50. Anna Karenina Leo Tolstoy
Haven't read it
51. Atonement Ian McEwan
Haven't read it.
52. Emma Jane Austen
One of my favorite Jane Austen books. Maybe my favorite. I don't really keep track.
53. Middlemarch George Eliot
Haven't read it
54. The Shadow of the Wind Carlos Ruiz Zafon
Haven't read it
55. The Color Purple Alice Walker
Haven't read it
56. The Very Hungry Caterpillar Eric Carle
I have read it, and even had to read it from the Chinese version. I gained a better appreciation of it when I translated from the Chinese version.
57. Brave New World Aldous Huxley
I enjoyed this book, unexpectedly.
58. Sense and Sensibility Jane Austen
My least favorite Jane Austen book. Marianne drives me CRAZY.
59. The Bell Jar Sylvia Plath
Haven't read it
60. Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland Lewis Carroll
Haven't read it
61. Charlotte’s Web E.B. White
I've read it. Can't say it's my favorite book, but I'm also not 8, so it probably shouldn't be.
62. Dracula Bram Stoker
Haven't read it
63. We’re Going on a Bear Hunt Michael Rosen and Helen Oxenbury
Haven't read it, I don't think.
64. A Prayer for Owen Meany John Irving
Haven't read it
65. The Secret History Donna Tartt
Haven't read it
66. The Little Prince Antoine de Saint-Exupery
This is one of those books that I wonder if I really got the story at all. I like it, but it's one I need to keep reading it over and over.
67. Crime and Punishment Fyodor Dostoevsky
Haven't read it
68. The Poisonwood Bible Barbara Kingsolver
Haven't read it
69. Jude the Obscure Thomas Hardy
Haven't read it. Haven't been too interested in Hardy since Tess of the D'Urbervilles.
70. Skellig David Almond
Haven't read it
71. The Woman in White Wilkie Collins
Haven't read it
72. Gone with the Wind Margaret Mitchell
Haven't read it
73. Game of Thrones (series) George R.R. Martin
Haven't read it. Probably won't. I think he's basically trying to sex up fantasy, and I don't really need that in my life.
74. David Copperfield Charles Dickens
Haven't read it
75. Never Let Me Go Kazuo Ishiguro
Haven't read it
76. Where the Wild Things Are Maurice Sendak
Read it, own it in Spanish.
77. Twilight (series) Stephenie Meyer
Haven't read it. I will NEVER read it. On principle.
78. Beloved Toni Morrison
Haven't read it
79. The Help Kathryn Stockett
I really liked this book. The pie story was a bit disgusting, but the book was fantastic. A really interesting perspective.
80. Sherlock Holmes (series) Arthur Conan Doyle
Haven't read it. Somehow, Sherlock Holmes has never been my thing. I love the new series, though.
81. Half of a Yellow Sun Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie
Haven't read it
82. Moneyball Michael Lewis
Haven't read it
83. My Family and Other Animals Gerald Durrell
Haven't read it. I started it, but was having a hard time getting into it. Not because it wasn't good, it just wasn't reeling me in.
84. Memoirs of a Geisha Arthur Golden
Haven't read it
85. On the Road Jack Kerouac
Haven't read it
86. Cloud Atlas David Mitchell
Haven't read it. Started it, then got into the George, Nicholas, and Wilhelm book. Cloud Atlas wasn't drawing me in. It was so slow. I may pick it up again eventually, but it's not on the top ten list.
87. Wild Swans Jung Chang
Haven't read it
88. Anne of Green Gables L.M. Montgomery
This is a good book. It isn't my favorite LM Montgomery book, and it isn't even my favorite Anne Shirley book. But, you have to read it to get the rest. (Just learn what parts of the poetic prose you can skim).
89. Les Miserables Victor Hugo
Haven't read it, but I really need to.
90. Room on the Broom Julia Donaldson and Axel Scheffler
Haven't read it
91. Private Peaceful Michael Morpurgo
Haven't read it
92. Noughts and Crosses Malorie Blackman
Haven't read it
93. Cider with Rosie Laurie Lee
Haven't read it
94. Danny the Champion of the World Roald Dahl
Read this one, during my Roald Dahl reading kick, years ago. If memory serves, this was one of my favorites from Dahl.
95. Down and Out in Paris and London George Orwell
Haven't read it
96. The Magic Faraway Tree Enid Blyton
Haven't read it
97. The Witches Roald Dahl
One of his creepier books. Good, but a little unnerving.
98. The God of Small Things Arundhati Roy
Haven't read it
99. Holes Louis Sachar
Terrific book. It's so cool how everything fits together at the end.
100. The Picture of Dorian Gray Oscar Wilde.
Haven't read it. I should at some point, just haven't yet.
Sunday, March 31, 2013
Family Feud
This week, I finished reading George, Nicholas and Wilhelm: Three Royal Cousins and the Road to War, by Miranda Carter. (This is the book that was the one that had all appearance of being utterly dull). It was amazing. Book review over.
Alright, fine. I'll go a bit more in depth. I'm not going to go into the details of WWI and history and such, but I do want to give the impressions this book left, that you don't get if you just read the tragically uninsightful history books of K-12. So, if you don't know much about the world at the time, you are going to have to do some background reading.
What really stood out was how dysfunctional the royalty of Europe was during the mid-1800's to the time of WWI. This book is less a look at the historical facts and more a look at the mentalities, the motivations that drove George, Nicholas, Wilhelm, Queen Victoria, King Edward VII, and others. Honestly, if anyone needed Dr. Phil, or Nanny 911, it was the royal family, which was pretty much everyone royal at the time, because they literally were a family. Imagine that family reunion!!! And, based on this book, the family reunions of these guys could trump just about any family reunion you've ever been to. And they make an excellent example of why politics should NOT be discussed at family get-togethers. Really, though, it was fascinating to read about these people as a family first, and government leaders second. And to see how their family relationships impacted politics and affected the entire world.
Another thing that stood out to me was how utterly pointless WWI was. Honestly, it was just someone really anxious to blow things up and shoot guns and prove that they were king of the mountain. There was no other reason for it. It wasn't about anything other than egos. It was about empire, and being the biggest world power. Which, sadly, in some ways hasn't changed much.
As I read, I found it much more difficult to sympathize with Wilhelm, but as I reflect, he probably deserves the most pity. Socially inept, all he wanted was acceptance and respect, but everything he did resulted in exactly the opposite. And yet, because of his lack of social graces, it's very hard to sympathize with him. As things progress, I felt more frustration with Nicholas, as well, and yet, pity, also. He was a good man placed in the wrong place. But the story of Russia before the revolution that overthrew Nicholas gave a lot of insight into the history of Russia after Nicholas, and even up to the present day.
In the end, all you get is a sense of tragedy. There are so many what-ifs. Of course, none of those have guarantees, and there were so many factors at play, but still. Had even one of the many major decisions been made differently, the world could have followed a completely different course.
Anyway, it really was a terrific book, and despite how huge it looked, was far less daunting than it appeared.
Now, a little bonus today, if you would like to call it that. I read an article this week that really gave some excellent perspective to the gun issue. I have read several articles that have reframed the discussion for me. I decided that I would share this one: Living with guns the Swiss way. I think this brings up a lot of relevant points for reading informational literature, which may be the topic next time. But, I hope the article is as insightful for you as it was for me.
Alright, fine. I'll go a bit more in depth. I'm not going to go into the details of WWI and history and such, but I do want to give the impressions this book left, that you don't get if you just read the tragically uninsightful history books of K-12. So, if you don't know much about the world at the time, you are going to have to do some background reading.
What really stood out was how dysfunctional the royalty of Europe was during the mid-1800's to the time of WWI. This book is less a look at the historical facts and more a look at the mentalities, the motivations that drove George, Nicholas, Wilhelm, Queen Victoria, King Edward VII, and others. Honestly, if anyone needed Dr. Phil, or Nanny 911, it was the royal family, which was pretty much everyone royal at the time, because they literally were a family. Imagine that family reunion!!! And, based on this book, the family reunions of these guys could trump just about any family reunion you've ever been to. And they make an excellent example of why politics should NOT be discussed at family get-togethers. Really, though, it was fascinating to read about these people as a family first, and government leaders second. And to see how their family relationships impacted politics and affected the entire world.
Another thing that stood out to me was how utterly pointless WWI was. Honestly, it was just someone really anxious to blow things up and shoot guns and prove that they were king of the mountain. There was no other reason for it. It wasn't about anything other than egos. It was about empire, and being the biggest world power. Which, sadly, in some ways hasn't changed much.
As I read, I found it much more difficult to sympathize with Wilhelm, but as I reflect, he probably deserves the most pity. Socially inept, all he wanted was acceptance and respect, but everything he did resulted in exactly the opposite. And yet, because of his lack of social graces, it's very hard to sympathize with him. As things progress, I felt more frustration with Nicholas, as well, and yet, pity, also. He was a good man placed in the wrong place. But the story of Russia before the revolution that overthrew Nicholas gave a lot of insight into the history of Russia after Nicholas, and even up to the present day.
In the end, all you get is a sense of tragedy. There are so many what-ifs. Of course, none of those have guarantees, and there were so many factors at play, but still. Had even one of the many major decisions been made differently, the world could have followed a completely different course.
Anyway, it really was a terrific book, and despite how huge it looked, was far less daunting than it appeared.
Now, a little bonus today, if you would like to call it that. I read an article this week that really gave some excellent perspective to the gun issue. I have read several articles that have reframed the discussion for me. I decided that I would share this one: Living with guns the Swiss way. I think this brings up a lot of relevant points for reading informational literature, which may be the topic next time. But, I hope the article is as insightful for you as it was for me.
Tuesday, March 5, 2013
Waiting
My sister recommended Wait: The Art and Science of Delay, by Frank Partnoy, to me. She said it was really good and so I was slightly tempted to buy it when the library didn't have a copy readily available, but then I figured that I would heed the title and wait. But, I finally did get my hands on a copy, and finished it this last week.
I really enjoyed the book. There was a lot of good insight shared and some good research and Partnoy applied his concepts to a wide variety of scenarios that can have practical implications. For example, slow and steady in investing is a wise approach.
One of the chapters I found really interesting was the one on apologies. I thought his point about waiting to apologize to allow the victim time to air their grievances was a good one, but I think he didn't highlight the benefits to the apologizer. In some circumstances, an apology right away can seem insincere because the offender hasn't really had time to realize why they seven owe an apology. In some situations, an immediate apology might signify remorse at getting caught rather than remorse for actions. I also think it was unfortunate that many of his examples were politicians apologizing, because many of those accounts seemed to be more about image than real remorse. But, that might be a bit judgmental on my part.
I also thought the chapter about hourly versus salaried positions was really interesting. I have definitely found myself calculating how many hours something would cost me. It was interesting to see how that can affect us. And there was a great chapter on procrastination and making it work for you. (Which may not have been the best thing to tell an inveterate procrastinator. Or maybe a terrific thing to tell me, if I actually apply it).
Don't think, though, that this is a book about patience. It is really a book about timing and utilizing all the time available, instead of rushing things. Which is really different from patience, in my ever-so-expert experience (ha ha). It is definitely worth reading.
I really enjoyed the book. There was a lot of good insight shared and some good research and Partnoy applied his concepts to a wide variety of scenarios that can have practical implications. For example, slow and steady in investing is a wise approach.
One of the chapters I found really interesting was the one on apologies. I thought his point about waiting to apologize to allow the victim time to air their grievances was a good one, but I think he didn't highlight the benefits to the apologizer. In some circumstances, an apology right away can seem insincere because the offender hasn't really had time to realize why they seven owe an apology. In some situations, an immediate apology might signify remorse at getting caught rather than remorse for actions. I also think it was unfortunate that many of his examples were politicians apologizing, because many of those accounts seemed to be more about image than real remorse. But, that might be a bit judgmental on my part.
I also thought the chapter about hourly versus salaried positions was really interesting. I have definitely found myself calculating how many hours something would cost me. It was interesting to see how that can affect us. And there was a great chapter on procrastination and making it work for you. (Which may not have been the best thing to tell an inveterate procrastinator. Or maybe a terrific thing to tell me, if I actually apply it).
Don't think, though, that this is a book about patience. It is really a book about timing and utilizing all the time available, instead of rushing things. Which is really different from patience, in my ever-so-expert experience (ha ha). It is definitely worth reading.
Monday, January 28, 2013
Living History
I think there is a most unfortunate perception of history being nothing more than names, dates, and places. It is a real tragedy that history is seen as so dull and irrelevant, because a better understanding of history could really change the world. (Which may be illustrated better in a paragraph or two, so hold that thought). I've mentioned a few books before that I think really do history the justice it deserves: there's this one about King George VI, and this one, or this one, which admittedly is fiction. Or history in the eyes of Ford, or one that I apparently haven't mentioned, but should have, called Lies My Teacher Told Me, by James Loewen. Well, I read another book this last week that did a great job of giving history life.
Along the lines of the Ford book, Between You and Me: A Memoir, by Mike Wallace (of 60 Minutes fame) and Gary Paul Gates gives a look at history through the eyes of people who made it. Now, to clarify. It's not a book about history. It's a book that tells about a man's experiences interacting with people who are big names in history of all kinds (entertainment history, political and international history, etc.). Wallace basically reminisces on his impressions and interactions with the people he interviewed. He tells about how his work and life intertwined, although don't expect this to be a "life of Mike Wallace" experience. You'll learn a bit about him, but this is a memoir, not an autobiography. For me, it was fascinating to read his impressions of the times he lived in.
Now, back to the whole understanding history thing. One of the most fascinating accounts to me was his account of interviewing the Shah of Iran, and the Ayatollah. I think this amazed me because he was able to trace the effects of the overthrow of the Shah in a way that no one talks about, but should. That revolution sparked events that eventually connect to 9/11 in remarkable ways. I wasn't born when the revolution started, but the events that stemmed from that (which may have happened even if the Shah hadn't been overthrown--who knows) have definitely shaped the history of my life. And it is fascinating to read this story being told by someone who was there at the beginning and had the perspective to recognize the full extent of the story.
Alright, enough of my diatribing. This is a really great book and has something for everyone. Wallace interviewed stars, artists, politicians, generals, criminals, and more, and this book is full of great stories, and as a reporter, he tells them as stories, so it's very readable. So, have fun reading.
Along the lines of the Ford book, Between You and Me: A Memoir, by Mike Wallace (of 60 Minutes fame) and Gary Paul Gates gives a look at history through the eyes of people who made it. Now, to clarify. It's not a book about history. It's a book that tells about a man's experiences interacting with people who are big names in history of all kinds (entertainment history, political and international history, etc.). Wallace basically reminisces on his impressions and interactions with the people he interviewed. He tells about how his work and life intertwined, although don't expect this to be a "life of Mike Wallace" experience. You'll learn a bit about him, but this is a memoir, not an autobiography. For me, it was fascinating to read his impressions of the times he lived in.
Now, back to the whole understanding history thing. One of the most fascinating accounts to me was his account of interviewing the Shah of Iran, and the Ayatollah. I think this amazed me because he was able to trace the effects of the overthrow of the Shah in a way that no one talks about, but should. That revolution sparked events that eventually connect to 9/11 in remarkable ways. I wasn't born when the revolution started, but the events that stemmed from that (which may have happened even if the Shah hadn't been overthrown--who knows) have definitely shaped the history of my life. And it is fascinating to read this story being told by someone who was there at the beginning and had the perspective to recognize the full extent of the story.
Alright, enough of my diatribing. This is a really great book and has something for everyone. Wallace interviewed stars, artists, politicians, generals, criminals, and more, and this book is full of great stories, and as a reporter, he tells them as stories, so it's very readable. So, have fun reading.
Saturday, December 8, 2012
Watch what you read
Okay, I am an information professional and as such, I sometimes feel a responsibility to read books about information. You know how it goes--gotta stay up on things. I stumbled across an article about The Information Diet by Clay Johnson while doing research for work (it was one of the serendipitous finds of internet research). I had heard of this book before and after reading the article, I really wanted to read the book. My hold finally came in at the library (go libraries) and it is definitely worth reading.
So, what is it about? Johnson basically compares the so-called "information overload" with obesity. This struck a chord with me, because I took a semester long class centered on information overload and was never really satisfied with their solutions (better technology! better organization! Better users? Not so much). There is quite a bit of fascinating information presented, and the comparison to obesity is really apt for the topic.
Now, I'm not a huge fan of self-help books, and while this isn't a self-help book exactly, it does give recommendations to the user. But the author is very open about saying they are just suggestions, and each person will need to find what works best for them, which makes it easier to take. (Anyone who tries to sell me on a one-size fits all approach makes the skepticism flare up something awful, and that just brings on the mockery).
Johnson's goal is to create a better informed populace. Too often we consume information the way we eat--we go for the 'fast food' of information, and what we get is overprocessed, high in 'calories', and low in mental nutrition. And because of that, that is the kind of information people create. He also points out that information consumption has physical effects that can be unhealthy, and so he provides some tips that can help us control our consumption and create better mental and physical health.
One example: email. When we get an email, it effects our dopamine levels, and can affect our breathing and heart rate. We get a high from new emails. So then we check every ten seconds for new email to get that high. But that prevents us from focusing, and it messes up our balance. It's just not healthy. He recommends setting aside specific times (he has two) for checking email. I can say from personal experience, I'm a lot more productive if I don't keep my inbox open all the time, and I'm a lot better at actually dealing with my inbox if I'm not always in it.
I'm not saying you should take everything in the book at face value, and I don't think Johnson is, either. But I do think there are some fantastic ideas in it that are worth considering. It can't hurt.
Sunday, November 11, 2012
Split second decisions
I recently had an interview and was asked to tell about the best decision and worst decision I've made, and the process I used to make the respective decisions. After the interview, I had this introspective moment where I had to wonder whether I would have answered the question differently if I hadn't just started listening to Blink by Malcolm Gladwell. The decisions I chose were both decisions made more intuitively, rather than reasoning through them, and parts of those decisions may or may not have been based on what Gladwell would term "rapid cognition." Which just so happens to be the topic of the book.
I've read Gladwell's stuff before and I've really liked the insights he gives. There's a certain logic to them, and I've seen his conclusions ring true. So, I was pretty confident I'd like Blink, and I was right. Lots of insights, and it kind of gives me a bit of ammo for when I feel like I have to justify some of my decision making processes or past decisions. He also explores the pros and cons of rapid cognition, how it can be a good thing, but the traps we need to watch out for. He doesn't give a checklist or anything for how to make it work--it's not a self-help book--but he does provide a lot of examples of how this can apply. I think basically, Gladwell's works give the reader a foundation. I come away from reading his stuff feeling like I know more, and because I know more, I'm more aware of my behavior and how it might be affecting me and others, and that in turn helps me modify the parts of my behavior that I feel could improve. So much better than having someone try to tell you how you should be.
So, no. I haven't really told you much about rapid cognition, or given examples or even a good synopsis of Blink. If I did that, you wouldn't have to read it, and he tells it way better than I do. I will say, if you are looking for some good non-fiction, Gladwell is a good author to check out, and Blink would be as good a place to start as any. But you might want to be careful about reading it in conjunction with an interview.*
*I will say, the interview went well--they asked for another one, so it would seem that despite my intuitive decision making, they liked me.
I've read Gladwell's stuff before and I've really liked the insights he gives. There's a certain logic to them, and I've seen his conclusions ring true. So, I was pretty confident I'd like Blink, and I was right. Lots of insights, and it kind of gives me a bit of ammo for when I feel like I have to justify some of my decision making processes or past decisions. He also explores the pros and cons of rapid cognition, how it can be a good thing, but the traps we need to watch out for. He doesn't give a checklist or anything for how to make it work--it's not a self-help book--but he does provide a lot of examples of how this can apply. I think basically, Gladwell's works give the reader a foundation. I come away from reading his stuff feeling like I know more, and because I know more, I'm more aware of my behavior and how it might be affecting me and others, and that in turn helps me modify the parts of my behavior that I feel could improve. So much better than having someone try to tell you how you should be.
So, no. I haven't really told you much about rapid cognition, or given examples or even a good synopsis of Blink. If I did that, you wouldn't have to read it, and he tells it way better than I do. I will say, if you are looking for some good non-fiction, Gladwell is a good author to check out, and Blink would be as good a place to start as any. But you might want to be careful about reading it in conjunction with an interview.*
*I will say, the interview went well--they asked for another one, so it would seem that despite my intuitive decision making, they liked me.
Friday, September 21, 2012
Finishing
It is really satisfying to finish books, especially ones that are on your to-read list. This week, I finished a few books, most of which were on my list, including:
Maphead, by Ken Jennings: Good read. Not a geography textbook, more a look at the history of geography, the uses of it, how it's changed, and the quirks of people into geography. Don't think you'll come away with a basic knowledge of the world map. Instead, you'll come away wanting that knowledge. Don't be intimidated. Jennings' style is light and entertaining.
Out of the Silent Planet, by C.S. Lewis: First thing you think of when you hear C.S. Lewis? Narnia and books on Christianity. Science fiction? Not so much. But, he did author a sci-fi trilogy. I started reading it, then lost my copy (fortunately it was a 50 cent copy. Still, sad) and had to check out a copy from the library. I think having read it over so much time made it a bit harder to follow, but at the end, I really wanted to know what happens next. So, looks like at some point, I'll be picking up the next book. True to his style in The Chronicles of Narnia, there are religious overtones. It's interesting to read sci-fi from so early (mid 1900's), and to try to imagine what Lewis envisioned as he wrote. Also interesting, because he's writing about a man who visits Mars (hope that's not too much of a spoiler), which probably seemed impossible then, but we've got stuff on Mars now. There are lots of dimensions to explore here.
Turtle in Paradise, Jennifer Holm: This is one of those books that just tells a story. There's no overt moral or theme or lesson. It is just a story about life in Florida during the Depression. Written for the upper grade school age (by my estimate), it is an enjoyable read. Good style, the characters are real and believable. Now, as far as plot goes--don't expect a plot. This book is like life. It just unfolds. I like books like that, and this one is a good one.
Princess Ben, Catherine Gilbert Murdock: I don't know why I'm so into fairy tales rewritten lately, but it seems like I am. Think retelling of Sleeping Beauty crossed with an element of Snow White and a tower factor (Rapunzel, anyone?), with references to a lot of other fairy tales. Young adult girls will definitely like it. Not all retellings are equal, but this is on the high end of the scale.
Don't think I wasted any time filling up my list, though. I've been investigating the Hamish MacBeth books by MC Beaton, I'm enjoying some Terry Pratchett, and I've got Mao's Last Dancer on the list.
Fingers crossed, soon I'll have less time for so much reading because I'll have a job, but in the meantime, I'm just going to enjoy things.
Hope I haven't bored you too much--I'll come up with something really exciting for next week!
Maphead, by Ken Jennings: Good read. Not a geography textbook, more a look at the history of geography, the uses of it, how it's changed, and the quirks of people into geography. Don't think you'll come away with a basic knowledge of the world map. Instead, you'll come away wanting that knowledge. Don't be intimidated. Jennings' style is light and entertaining.
Out of the Silent Planet, by C.S. Lewis: First thing you think of when you hear C.S. Lewis? Narnia and books on Christianity. Science fiction? Not so much. But, he did author a sci-fi trilogy. I started reading it, then lost my copy (fortunately it was a 50 cent copy. Still, sad) and had to check out a copy from the library. I think having read it over so much time made it a bit harder to follow, but at the end, I really wanted to know what happens next. So, looks like at some point, I'll be picking up the next book. True to his style in The Chronicles of Narnia, there are religious overtones. It's interesting to read sci-fi from so early (mid 1900's), and to try to imagine what Lewis envisioned as he wrote. Also interesting, because he's writing about a man who visits Mars (hope that's not too much of a spoiler), which probably seemed impossible then, but we've got stuff on Mars now. There are lots of dimensions to explore here.
Turtle in Paradise, Jennifer Holm: This is one of those books that just tells a story. There's no overt moral or theme or lesson. It is just a story about life in Florida during the Depression. Written for the upper grade school age (by my estimate), it is an enjoyable read. Good style, the characters are real and believable. Now, as far as plot goes--don't expect a plot. This book is like life. It just unfolds. I like books like that, and this one is a good one.
Princess Ben, Catherine Gilbert Murdock: I don't know why I'm so into fairy tales rewritten lately, but it seems like I am. Think retelling of Sleeping Beauty crossed with an element of Snow White and a tower factor (Rapunzel, anyone?), with references to a lot of other fairy tales. Young adult girls will definitely like it. Not all retellings are equal, but this is on the high end of the scale.
Don't think I wasted any time filling up my list, though. I've been investigating the Hamish MacBeth books by MC Beaton, I'm enjoying some Terry Pratchett, and I've got Mao's Last Dancer on the list.
Fingers crossed, soon I'll have less time for so much reading because I'll have a job, but in the meantime, I'm just going to enjoy things.
Hope I haven't bored you too much--I'll come up with something really exciting for next week!
Saturday, June 30, 2012
But wait! There's more....
This week, I finished listening to The King's Speech, by Mark Logue and Peter Conradi. It was terrific, especially if you like history. I really wanted to see the movie, but couldn't for the simple fact that I have this standard of no R movies. So, I did the next best thing--or maybe the better thing--and listened to the book. It was terrific. You get your British history, your world history, your WWII history, your medical history (the history of speech therapy), a lot of biography, and your speech therapy/psychology. Highlights:
-King George VI was a really good person. There have been a lot of rotten rulers from a lot of countries and from every time, but this guy was a pretty stand-up person. It's always great to read about a quality person.
-The perspective people had on stammerers and speech 'defects' (not my phrasing). It is kind of mind boggling. The trend was to treat it all as a psychological problem. So, Lionel Logue approached it as a physical problem, and it got some good results. Of course, there is a psychological element--any physical problem has psychological effects. But Logue helped people move past the physical problem, and that resolved any psychological side effects.
-Score one for archivists! This is a great example of how valuable our records can be.
Verdict: Well written story, definitely a worthwhile read.
But wait...there's more!
I also finished The Handmaid's Tale by Margaret Atwood. So, I have mixed feelings about this one. It was interesting, and I would say it was good, but to say it was good seems the wrong approach. And it isn't really a question of did I like it or not. This is one of those books that just doesn't fit into the regular categories. 'Good' and "liked it' don't seem to be the right words. Should you choose to read it,you should know it is a bit risque, on the surface, but there is more to the story than that, and that is not what the story is about. -Ask people you trust, people who know you and your standards before you read it. There are a lot of really interesting issues addressed in the book, but the route it takes may not be up your alley. (I don't know if there is any other route that could have been taken).
Verdict: I liked the book. I think Atwood is a good author. But read with caution.
But wait...there's more!
I am currently listening to Planet Google: One Company's Audacious Plan To Organize Everything We Know, by Randall Stross. It is fascinating! I think I mentioned that this was a random choice at the library. But it turned out to be serendipitous. So far, the book has covered Google's dedication to openness, their approach to business, their growth, the Google Books project (which, I have heard a lot about, but this was a new perspective), Google translate (so interesting!), and the acquisition of YouTube. Just to name a few topics. I am learning a lot about Google, which, given it's huge presence in the world, can't be a bad thing. I haven't finished the book yet, but I definitely like it. I think the major disappointment is that the book was published in 2008, so there are 4 packed years that aren't covered!
Verdict: A delightful surprise, I'm really glad I pulled it.
But wait! One more...
I am also reading A Wrinkle in Time, by Madeleine L'Engle. An oldie but a goodie. I have read this one before, but it's been a while, so I'm doing a reread. I have a niece who has been dragging her feet about reading this one, but I've got to get her to read it. It's terrific, so far. (But having read it before, I know it's good). I think I'm going to have to read more of L'Engle's books, though.
Verdict: A must read for everyone.
But wait! Just kidding. That's all for now. I did remember one more book I'm listening to, but I'll save that for later. I think I've reviewed enough for now. So, there you go. Happy reading!
-King George VI was a really good person. There have been a lot of rotten rulers from a lot of countries and from every time, but this guy was a pretty stand-up person. It's always great to read about a quality person.
-The perspective people had on stammerers and speech 'defects' (not my phrasing). It is kind of mind boggling. The trend was to treat it all as a psychological problem. So, Lionel Logue approached it as a physical problem, and it got some good results. Of course, there is a psychological element--any physical problem has psychological effects. But Logue helped people move past the physical problem, and that resolved any psychological side effects.
-Score one for archivists! This is a great example of how valuable our records can be.
Verdict: Well written story, definitely a worthwhile read.
But wait...there's more!
I also finished The Handmaid's Tale by Margaret Atwood. So, I have mixed feelings about this one. It was interesting, and I would say it was good, but to say it was good seems the wrong approach. And it isn't really a question of did I like it or not. This is one of those books that just doesn't fit into the regular categories. 'Good' and "liked it' don't seem to be the right words. Should you choose to read it,you should know it is a bit risque, on the surface, but there is more to the story than that, and that is not what the story is about. -Ask people you trust, people who know you and your standards before you read it. There are a lot of really interesting issues addressed in the book, but the route it takes may not be up your alley. (I don't know if there is any other route that could have been taken).
Verdict: I liked the book. I think Atwood is a good author. But read with caution.
But wait...there's more!
I am currently listening to Planet Google: One Company's Audacious Plan To Organize Everything We Know, by Randall Stross. It is fascinating! I think I mentioned that this was a random choice at the library. But it turned out to be serendipitous. So far, the book has covered Google's dedication to openness, their approach to business, their growth, the Google Books project (which, I have heard a lot about, but this was a new perspective), Google translate (so interesting!), and the acquisition of YouTube. Just to name a few topics. I am learning a lot about Google, which, given it's huge presence in the world, can't be a bad thing. I haven't finished the book yet, but I definitely like it. I think the major disappointment is that the book was published in 2008, so there are 4 packed years that aren't covered!
Verdict: A delightful surprise, I'm really glad I pulled it.
But wait! One more...
I am also reading A Wrinkle in Time, by Madeleine L'Engle. An oldie but a goodie. I have read this one before, but it's been a while, so I'm doing a reread. I have a niece who has been dragging her feet about reading this one, but I've got to get her to read it. It's terrific, so far. (But having read it before, I know it's good). I think I'm going to have to read more of L'Engle's books, though.
Verdict: A must read for everyone.
But wait! Just kidding. That's all for now. I did remember one more book I'm listening to, but I'll save that for later. I think I've reviewed enough for now. So, there you go. Happy reading!
Friday, June 1, 2012
I can relate to that
I am a fan of Wait, Wait...Don't Tell Me. It makes me laugh and I take all the laughter I can get in my life. Each week, as they introduce the panelists, they often refer to books the panelists have written. I'm not sure why, but I decided to actually read something written by Tom Bodett. I was pleased to find that the library had some of his books, and checked out As Far as You Can Go Without a Passport. It was a very short and quick read, consisting of commentaries Bodett wrote back in the 80's (a time during which I was alive) for a local radio station. Each commentary became a chapter in the book and they were all about a page to a page and a half, which means that you can actually make progress in those spare five minute segments of life. But even better, it was a delightful read.
Bodett just writes about everyday, normal life. He writes about grocery shopping without a list, about family, friends, the missing sock phenomenon, and people in general. It's hard to choose which essays (which read like columns in a paper, not essays, really) I like the best, because they were all so relevant. For example, the essay about being in his thirties. Rather than feeling old and burned out, he expresses how great life is, and how exciting and full of possibility. I feel the same way. I am not young anymore, but I don't want to be. I like where I am at in life (on a general level. Some of the specifics I have issues with, but most of the time, not to a degree to sweat it). I also loved the essay about getting passionate about a cause. It just takes too much energy, and it seems like there are so many better things to be occupied with. Bodett manages to express it so perfectly.
While he does poke fun at the way people work, he also expresses a down-to-earth gratitude, such as in the when he writes about pregnant women, or the Group That Notices Things. Those chapters make you want to be a better person and leave you feeling good about humanity.
As the introduction to the book says, it's a normal book written about normal things by a normal guy. Which is almost a rarity anymore, if you think about it. But don't let all that normalness fool you. It's a pretty simple book but it's a keeper.
Bodett just writes about everyday, normal life. He writes about grocery shopping without a list, about family, friends, the missing sock phenomenon, and people in general. It's hard to choose which essays (which read like columns in a paper, not essays, really) I like the best, because they were all so relevant. For example, the essay about being in his thirties. Rather than feeling old and burned out, he expresses how great life is, and how exciting and full of possibility. I feel the same way. I am not young anymore, but I don't want to be. I like where I am at in life (on a general level. Some of the specifics I have issues with, but most of the time, not to a degree to sweat it). I also loved the essay about getting passionate about a cause. It just takes too much energy, and it seems like there are so many better things to be occupied with. Bodett manages to express it so perfectly.
While he does poke fun at the way people work, he also expresses a down-to-earth gratitude, such as in the when he writes about pregnant women, or the Group That Notices Things. Those chapters make you want to be a better person and leave you feeling good about humanity.
As the introduction to the book says, it's a normal book written about normal things by a normal guy. Which is almost a rarity anymore, if you think about it. But don't let all that normalness fool you. It's a pretty simple book but it's a keeper.
Saturday, March 17, 2012
An almost biography
A month or two ago, my sister was telling me about a book she heard about on NPR. This book was about introverts, and from my sister's description, and what I read on NPR, I really wanted to read this book. So I got my hands on Quiet: The Power of Introverts in a World That Can't Stop Talking by Susan Cain, and it was worth the read. I'm always a little wary of books like this, and try to take them with a grain of salt (I don't know why--maybe because I don't like to feel like I have to fit someone else's characterization of me, I like to feel like I decide my personality. Who knows. Just a hunch). Anyway, this was a really insightful book. Very validating for an introvert, and at the same time, it didn't paint the issue in black and white. It was nice to feel understood, and also to feel like, even though I am a behind the scenes kind of person, I can accomplish great things, and that I have talents that other don't. The book also helps build understanding between introverts and extroverts.
Anyway, what I learned is that it is totally okay that I find being an part of an audience one of my talents. And it's wonderful that there are people who like to do things that need an audience, so that I can develop that talent. It is terrific that there are different types of people, because we all have our niche, and I think this book just helps us know how to get along better.
So, if you are an introvert, it will help you understand how to better contribute, and if you aren't an introvert, it is great to help you understand us introverts, because we may be kind of confusing. And if you fall somewhere in between (because there are all types of people out there--yay!) you'll get the best of both sides. It's an easy, enjoyable read, and has a lot of great insights for anyone interested in people.
Anyway, what I learned is that it is totally okay that I find being an part of an audience one of my talents. And it's wonderful that there are people who like to do things that need an audience, so that I can develop that talent. It is terrific that there are different types of people, because we all have our niche, and I think this book just helps us know how to get along better.
So, if you are an introvert, it will help you understand how to better contribute, and if you aren't an introvert, it is great to help you understand us introverts, because we may be kind of confusing. And if you fall somewhere in between (because there are all types of people out there--yay!) you'll get the best of both sides. It's an easy, enjoyable read, and has a lot of great insights for anyone interested in people.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)